Insert Rat Pun Here
Thursday, February 28th, 2008It’s a cliche by now to observe that once you notice or remark upon something, suddenly you see it everywhere and it practically seems to be stalking you, but in this case, I think it actually may be true.
OK, not really, but it is pretty strange to blog about the awful and heavy-handed symbolism of the rat in The Departed and then to see the same damn thing just a few weeks later in an otherwise stupendously good BBC production from seventeen years ago. And when I say “the same damn thing”, I mean that literally. In The Departed, Scorcese put up a huge neon sign saying “CORRUPTION HERE!” with a big blinking arrow pointing right at the government by having a rat run up and across a railing with the Massachusetts State House in the background, and in House of Cards, Paul Seed did the same thing about a dozen times over by repeatedly cutting to rats cavorting through London, generally against the backdrop of one august and historic government structure or another. In fact, I have a very strong suspicion that Scorcese got the idea from House of Cards; he’s certainly very literate in film, and I’m sure he’s seen plenty of TV too.
(On a side note, isn’t it interesting (and depressing) that we have a variety of expressions for people who are conversant with literature — “well-read” and “literate” being just two of many — but none for people who have a great deal of knowledge about film? I was tempted to roll my own and call Scorcese “well-viewed”, but I thought people might think I was saying his films have been seen by a lot of people. We movie people need more respect!)
For those of you who don’t know what the heck House of Cards is, it’s a fantastic miniseries about a consummate back-room politician who decides one day that he wants to become Prime Minister of England (the ultimate front-room position) and goes after the job with every last bit of guile and venom he can muster. He regularly confides in us, the audience, but he keeps his hand carefully hidden from all the other characters in the story, and as his schemes unfold, we can only marvel at their ever-greater audacity — and, at least for awhile, at their continuing success.
Obviously, House has some clear similarities to Shakespeare’s Richard III, and also to the stellar but unfortunately short-lived TV show Profit, both of which I highly recommend. The beauty of Profit and Richard III — and of the vast majority of House of Cards, for that matter — is that they’re stuffed with magnificently-executed subtext, and understanding all the layers of meaning that unspool before us is tremendously rewarding, because we feel like we’ve accomplished something by figuring them out and putting them together. Furthermore, because we’ve drawn our conclusions ourselves, we take a sort of emotional ownership of them, accepting them as our own. That’s why preaching and overt messages rarely work; they’re finished conclusions people are trying to force on us, not deductions we’re allowed to partake in.
The rats, unfortunately, are the worst sort of preaching, completely free of subtext, and as such they stand in stark and unfortunate contrast to the rest of The Departed and House of Cards, both of which are otherwise written with great subtlety and skill.
We now return you to your regularly-scheduled rodent-free browsing.
Tags: Antihero, House of Cards, Martin Scorcese, Moral Complexity, Profit, Rat, Richard III, Subtext, Symbolism, The Departed